Swedish - 'Free school' system puts pay to equal education

16th October 2009 at 01:00

Tooley and Dixon imply in their "research" that the free market is the best way to provide a decent education ("Private need not be a middle-class preserve", October 9).

They say private schools are better than state schools. Why is this? Is it because they are largely populated by privileged pupils taught in smaller classes with better resources? So when all schools are privatised, all pupils will end up in smaller classes with better resources (and, of course, better teachers)?

OK, let's privatise schools. Entrepreneurs (or heads) vie for customers (pupils), by convincing shareholders (parents) to invest in their businesses (schools). The employees (teachers) are profit driven and will be fired if they fail to meet their targets. Businesses will be shut if they don't make a profit (get good results). What could go wrong?

Richard Hand, Little Heath School, Reading.

Log-in as an existing print or digital subscriber

Forgotten your subscriber ID?


To access this content and the full TES archive, subscribe now.

View subscriber offers


Get TES online and delivered to your door – for less than the price of a coffee

Save 33% off the cover price with this great subscription offer. Every copy delivered to your door by first-class post, plus full access to TES online and the TES app for just £1.90 per week.
Subscribers also enjoy a range of fantastic offers and benefits worth over £270:

  • Discounts off TES Institute courses
  • Access over 200,000 articles in the TES online archive
  • Free Tastecard membership worth £79.99
  • Discounts with Zipcar, Buyagift.com, Virgin Wines and other partners
Order your low-cost subscription today