The system is as elitist as it ever was

20th October 2006 at 01:00
It is a classic example of the best being the enemy of the good. Schools under pressure to hit government performance targets set very high entry requirements for A-level students. The rest go to college, a training centre or, worse, drop out.

This is where social segregation and inequality start - a trend reinforced by institutional arrangements. All favours follow the socio-economically advantaged sixth-form students: more cash, more kudos, more contact with teachers - and higher average salaries for life.

It beggars belief that a Labour government committed to improved social mobility should allow such conditions to pertain for almost 10 years. The research findings from Greenwich University this week (page 1) make depressing reading. The divide between the educational haves and have-nots appears to be as great as ever.

The cause of this malaise has not really changed The English education system is elitist, wrapped cosily in traditional middle-class values and deaf to those with the weakest voices. After tinkering with A-levels and post-16 institutional arrangements, Tony Blair and his ministers walk the well-trodden path through Middle England.

This is not to decry what has been achieved - increased staying-on rates, higher achievement and far better relations between education and industry.

But what might have been achieved with a truly radical 14-19 curriculum and assessment package and cash targeted at those in need?

Study authors Geoff Stanton and Mick Fletcher lay bare the issue. "Those 'with weaker voices' also suffer from the constant experimentation with vocational qualifications, which contrasts markedly with the careful and cautious approach to reforming the academic route. One is subject to continuous revolution (with apparently little understanding of what already exists): the other to careful evolution (with apparently little understanding of some urgent problems)."

They find little evidence that Labour's cherished notions of "choice, diversity and specialisation" will deliver. If anything, they will work against the half of the population with the lowest participation rates.

Their siren warnings sound like a call to scrap all school sixth forms.

That would be a call too far. What they do call for is what New Labour promised. They echo the party's rallying cry when in opposition: "a managed tertiary system offers the best prospect of both quality and equity".

Log-in as an existing print or digital subscriber

Forgotten your subscriber ID?


To access this content and the full TES archive, subscribe now.

View subscriber offers


Get TES online and delivered to your door – for less than the price of a coffee

Save 33% off the cover price with this great subscription offer. Every copy delivered to your door by first-class post, plus full access to TES online and the TES app for just £1.90 per week.
Subscribers also enjoy a range of fantastic offers and benefits worth over £270:

  • Discounts off TES Institute courses
  • Access over 200,000 articles in the TES online archive
  • Free Tastecard membership worth £79.99
  • Discounts with Zipcar,, Virgin Wines and other partners
Order your low-cost subscription today