System is unfair to bac students

21st July 2006 at 01:00
I was interested that the university admissions service Ucas has introduced a new points tariff for the international baccalaureate and A-levels. What a shame Ucas made these changes so late that another two cohorts of IB students (2006 and 2007) have had their prospects blighted.

My son applied for a place to study ancient history next year at King's College London, the guideline A-level score for which is BBB. Yet he was offered a place on the basis of an IB score of 32 points, which we now discover is equivalent to AAAB at A-level. Sadly, he achieved 31 points, (equivalent to three As and a C), and King's turned him down with the comment: "We never accept anyone with less than 32 points." They will, however, no doubt welcome plenty of students with A-level grades lower than AAAC.

My son would have been far better off doing A-levels. Had he done so, he would no doubt have easily secured his place at King's.

Ucas should have been much more proactive about introducing this realistic tariff for the IB.

The Government has been promoting the international baccalaureate as a gold standard for years - but much good it has done the students who have taken it.

S Davies

5 Spencer Close



Log-in as an existing print or digital subscriber

Forgotten your subscriber ID?


To access this content and the full TES archive, subscribe now.

View subscriber offers


Get TES online and delivered to your door – for less than the price of a coffee

Save 33% off the cover price with this great subscription offer. Every copy delivered to your door by first-class post, plus full access to TES online and the TES app for just £1.90 per week.
Subscribers also enjoy a range of fantastic offers and benefits worth over £270:

  • Discounts off TES Institute courses
  • Access over 200,000 articles in the TES online archive
  • Free Tastecard membership worth £79.99
  • Discounts with Zipcar,, Virgin Wines and other partners
Order your low-cost subscription today