Targets are the handicap, not strategies

24th September 2010 at 01:00

I should clarify my quote on "the stupidity of targets" ("Hell-bent on reform, but who cared about teacher morale?", September 17). The interview with John Macbeath was in the context of the introduction of the nationwide literacy and numeracy strategies in 1998, which I am a great fan of - the literacy and numeracy hours, excellent supporting teaching materials, the very talented teams of professionals who support teachers.

I believe most teachers, following an initial reluctance, quickly came to respect these facets. What upset most primary schools was being given targets in "brown envelopes", with next to no consultation and spewed out by a linear regression model based on the central diktat that nationally 80 per cent would achieve level 4 in literacy.

Sandy Adamson, Department for Education, 1997-2002.

Log-in as an existing print or digital subscriber

Forgotten your subscriber ID?


To access this content and the full TES archive, subscribe now.

View subscriber offers


Get TES online and delivered to your door – for less than the price of a coffee

Save 33% off the cover price with this great subscription offer. Every copy delivered to your door by first-class post, plus full access to TES online and the TES app for just £1.90 per week.
Subscribers also enjoy a range of fantastic offers and benefits worth over £270:

  • Discounts off TES Institute courses
  • Access over 200,000 articles in the TES online archive
  • Free Tastecard membership worth £79.99
  • Discounts with Zipcar,, Virgin Wines and other partners
Order your low-cost subscription today