Technical schools turn their backs on NVQs

7th October 2011 at 01:00
Another blow to the reputation of the beleaguered qualification

There can be few qualifications that have been criticised as fiercely as the NVQ. It was created to provide practical training to prepare students for their chosen occupations; to set the benchmark for vocational learning. But in recent years it has been increasingly derided as low quality by experts and employers. Now TES has learned of another significant blow to the reputation of the qualification: it has not been approved to be taught in university technical colleges (UTCs).

The new breed of 14-19 schools are the brainchild of former education secretary Lord Baker. Backed by Michael Gove, they are designed to specialise in technical learning. A report by the Royal Academy of Engineering (RAE) published today - commissioned by the Baker Dearing Educational Trust (BDET), which promotes the UTC scheme - lists the science, technology, engineering and maths (Stem) qualifications regarded as high quality by industry experts. This is effectively a shortlist of GCSE and A-level equivalent qualifications approved for use in UTCs. It includes BTECs, diplomas and extended project qualifications, as well as more traditional GCSEs and A-levels in Stem subjects such as engineering, electronics, maths and physics.

But, although NVQs in subjects such as railway engineering, plumbing and vehicle maintenance were considered, none has made the cut. While they have not actually been banned from UTCs, the RAE report suggests that they could be used "in support of or combined with" the approved qualifications. According to BDET chief executive Peter Mitchell, UTCs must offer a broad education offering scope for progression in different areas, not just churn out learners to work in a specific industry. "Although UTCs have a great deal of employer engagement, and teach both practical and academic together, it still isn't like being at work. NVQs were never intended for schools," he said.

The report cites research which suggests that level 2 NVQs fail to boost learners' earning power; in fact, students with the qualification on average earned less than their peers who had no vocational qualifications at all. While level 3 NVQs gave learners an income boost of 5-7 per cent, their impact was outstripped by rival qualifications.

Dr Annette Cox, associate director of the Institute for Employment Studies, believes the NVQ ethos - demonstrating competence against set standards for specific occupations - does not sit comfortably with current education philosophy. "Some of the NVQ's critics have raised the idea of theoretical knowledge, arguing that it's possible to demonstrate competence without having a deep understanding or knowledge."

Even supporters of the NVQ have doubts about its suitability for UTCs. Nick Gooderson, head of education, training and qualifications at sector-skills council CITB-ConstructionSkills - which led a campaign to save the qualification in 2009 - agrees with the report's findings. "NVQs are respected in the industry, but we would hope that in UTCs you would get a broader grounding," he said.

A spokeswoman for City amp; Guilds, one of the biggest NVQ providers, is, unsurprisingly, defensive about the qualification, insisting that it is "highly valuable" and that those who take the right NVQs are "more likely to be in employment". But the RAE's concerns echo the findings of the Wolf review, published in March. Professor Alison Wolf, an economist at King's College London, concluded that the content of many NVQs "is not actually valued by employers and the labour market".

As Professor Wolf points out, "spending a year or two taking one on a government training scheme is likely to reduce someone's lifetime earnings, not raise them". In the brave new world of technical excellence, mere competency is not enough. The decision by the UTCs is another nail in the coffin of the NVQ.


Level 2 Stem qualifications approved for use in UTCs:

BTEC first diploma in vehicle technology

BTEC first certificate in engineering

BTEC first certificate in construction

Certificate in engineering

Certificate in engineering and technology

Certificate in 2D computer-aided design

Certificate in the use of maths

14-19 higher diploma in engineering

14-19 higher diploma in construction and the built environment

14-19 higher diploma in product design and manufacturing

Higher project qualification

GCSE design and technology

GCSE engineering

GCSE electronics

BTEC first diploma in applied science

BTEC first diploma in engineering

BTEC first diploma in construction.

Log-in as an existing print or digital subscriber

Forgotten your subscriber ID?


To access this content and the full TES archive, subscribe now.

View subscriber offers


Get TES online and delivered to your door – for less than the price of a coffee

Save 33% off the cover price with this great subscription offer. Every copy delivered to your door by first-class post, plus full access to TES online and the TES app for just £1.90 per week.
Subscribers also enjoy a range of fantastic offers and benefits worth over £270:

  • Discounts off TES Institute courses
  • Access over 200,000 articles in the TES online archive
  • Free Tastecard membership worth £79.99
  • Discounts with Zipcar,, Virgin Wines and other partners
Order your low-cost subscription today