Teen parlance sucks, no offence

14th July 2000 at 01:00
EVERY night before I go to bed I pray that I will not end up like my father.

True, I'd prefer to retain more of my hair than he did after 40 years of teaching and I very much hope that when I retire it'll be with more than a tweed jacket full of blackboard chalk but mainly I hope that when I'm 70 I won't be switching on Radio 4 every morning in order to fume about misuse of the English language.

I can understand that after a lifetime of marking it must be galling to hear people mistakenly using "due to" instead of "as a result of". Or ending sentences with a preposition, as I just did then. Or indeed reading people who start sentences with "but".

But language is a like a river. Always moving and invariably taking the easiest route. We teach children our language and they refashion it for us without even noticing they've done so. Recently my own daughters have taught me to use "as if" which, at the end of a sentence, casts doubt on the entire foregoing proposition.

I've also learned that ending a statement with "not" actually negates what you'vejust said. Plus there's the wholly new use of the phrase "so much" as in "that is so much not a good idea".

But two new ones have got me spluttering just like my Dad. "S'pose" is the new way of ending an argument when the other person has won. You don't say "Father it is true if I don't put away this stuff someone else will have to" you mutter "s'pose" which means "OK you may have won the argument, Dad, but don't think that I agree with you."

The other is "No offence" as in "I don't want you meeting me Dad, you look too weird. No offence." What bothers me about this latest teen-parlance is not the way it is modifying our use of English - I have no objection to new words like "skank" or new phrases like "it wrecks" which seems to have replaced "it hurts". What gets me is the way "S'pose" and "No offence" are being used to cloak unpleasant behaviour, allowing one to be offensive while hiding from the consequences. My father believed a spade should be called a spade and I agree with him. That which is skank should truly be acknowledged as skank.

Log-in as an existing print or digital subscriber

Forgotten your subscriber ID?


To access this content and the full TES archive, subscribe now.

View subscriber offers


Get TES online and delivered to your door – for less than the price of a coffee

Save 33% off the cover price with this great subscription offer. Every copy delivered to your door by first-class post, plus full access to TES online and the TES app for just £1.90 per week.
Subscribers also enjoy a range of fantastic offers and benefits worth over £270:

  • Discounts off TES Institute courses
  • Access over 200,000 articles in the TES online archive
  • Free Tastecard membership worth £79.99
  • Discounts with Zipcar, Buyagift.com, Virgin Wines and other partners
Order your low-cost subscription today