Tell me about experiment errors;Letter

19th June 1998 at 01:00
The article ("Candle experiment a lot of hot air", TES, June 5) implies that I was commenting on behalf of the Association for Science Education. While, like any teacher of primary science, I value my membership of this organisation, I spoke only for myself.

Irene Finch, in her 1971 book Nature Study and Science, identifies the problems with the candle in the jar activity, and points out that children have many explanations, but that the candle does not go out because all the oxygen is used up. Some Year 6 children germinated seeds and rusted nails in jars for me after the candle had gone out, which would have needed some oxygen.

The tongue area and taste activity has been in many textbooks. It never seems to work. Recent research suggests that the differences in taste sensitivity between individuals is enormous; so if children tell you that sprouts, liver or eggs taste disgusting to them, they may well be telling the truth.

I'm interested in examples of other dead-loss primary science activities that have been copied from book to book without practical testing. Do let me know of any that don't work for you.

John Stringer

30 Mill Street, Harbury, Warwickshire

Log-in as an existing print or digital subscriber

Forgotten your subscriber ID?


To access this content and the full TES archive, subscribe now.

View subscriber offers


Get TES online and delivered to your door – for less than the price of a coffee

Save 33% off the cover price with this great subscription offer. Every copy delivered to your door by first-class post, plus full access to TES online and the TES app for just £1.90 per week.
Subscribers also enjoy a range of fantastic offers and benefits worth over £270:

  • Discounts off TES Institute courses
  • Access over 200,000 articles in the TES online archive
  • Free Tastecard membership worth £79.99
  • Discounts with Zipcar,, Virgin Wines and other partners
Order your low-cost subscription today