Theory v theology

4th August 2000 at 01:00
THE letter by Andrew Bowdler (TESS, July 28) is indeed right when he says there is a problem with science today, as was indicated in your article, "Science students don't believe in Darwin". However, contrary to what he writes, scientists do not "believe only in those things that can be proved".

As any good scientist knows, a theory is never proven to be true. Scientists judge alternative theories by the evidence that supports or disconfirms them. The theory that best explains the prevailing evidence is considered most likely to be the corrct one.

However, any theory can be revised or overturned in the face of new evidence, unlike "theories" based on religious faith. That is what we should be teaching our science students.

And by these criteria, Darwinian evolution, and its modern variants, have vastly more scientific credibility than creationism.

Mr Bowdler is free to believe whatever he likes based on his faith. He should just not make the mistake of thinking that it is science. That is the problem with science today.

Jean McKendree


Log-in as an existing print or digital subscriber

Forgotten your subscriber ID?


To access this content and the full TES archive, subscribe now.

View subscriber offers


Get TES online and delivered to your door – for less than the price of a coffee

Save 33% off the cover price with this great subscription offer. Every copy delivered to your door by first-class post, plus full access to TES online and the TES app for just £1.90 per week.
Subscribers also enjoy a range of fantastic offers and benefits worth over £270:

  • Discounts off TES Institute courses
  • Access over 200,000 articles in the TES online archive
  • Free Tastecard membership worth £79.99
  • Discounts with Zipcar,, Virgin Wines and other partners
Order your low-cost subscription today