Think before you teach philosophy

21st October 2011 at 01:00

Thank you for your wise editorial in TESpro, but I must express some disappointment that the accompanying article is unduly influenced by a narrow, rather Anglocentric view of philosophical inquiry with children.

At the risk of appearing to reinforce the judgment that the field is "sometimes vitriolic" and "quite a hornet's nest", I should say that this, itself, is a narrow judgment unsupported by evidence. Both SAPERE (which promotes Philosophy for Children) and SOPHIA (its European equivalent, in which nearly 30 countries are represented) are inclusive and magnanimous networks of people who almost all practise what they endorse under the title of philosophical inquiry.

Both networks do, indeed, embrace a diversity of theory and practice, but I would assert that they demonstrate remarkable unanimity in regard to essential purposes and processes.

To leave your readers, then, with the impression of heinous division rather than healthy diversity is not only to perpetuate woolly thinking but, worse still, to undermine the sound practical advice of your very own editorial.

Roger Sutcliffe,, Former president, SAPERE and the International Council for Philosophical Inquiry with Children.

Log-in as an existing print or digital subscriber

Forgotten your subscriber ID?


To access this content and the full TES archive, subscribe now.

View subscriber offers


Get TES online and delivered to your door – for less than the price of a coffee

Save 33% off the cover price with this great subscription offer. Every copy delivered to your door by first-class post, plus full access to TES online and the TES app for just £1.90 per week.
Subscribers also enjoy a range of fantastic offers and benefits worth over £270:

  • Discounts off TES Institute courses
  • Access over 200,000 articles in the TES online archive
  • Free Tastecard membership worth £79.99
  • Discounts with Zipcar,, Virgin Wines and other partners
Order your low-cost subscription today