Too much jargon

16th December 2005 at 00:00
As a lifelong teacher of basic skills, I am delighted this essential part of learning to read is back in its rightful place.

Although the "blending" of sounds is certainly required, I cannot help thinking that the term "synthetic phonics" has an unfortunate implication of artificiality.

Although retired, I am still tutor of young pupils with learning difficulties and use My Books of Word Families that were published many years ago and quickly became bestsellers.

My pupils soon learn the difference between phonically-structured "sounding words" such as: c-a-t or h-a-t, and "sight words" that have to be learned as "wholes", such as once and laugh, that cannot be "sounded".

Why is so much of the vocabulary around reading unduly "jargonised"?

Nixie Taverner

28 Gooding Close Green Lane New Maiden, Surrey

Log-in as an existing print or digital subscriber

Forgotten your subscriber ID?


To access this content and the full TES archive, subscribe now.

View subscriber offers


Get TES online and delivered to your door – for less than the price of a coffee

Save 33% off the cover price with this great subscription offer. Every copy delivered to your door by first-class post, plus full access to TES online and the TES app for just £1.90 per week.
Subscribers also enjoy a range of fantastic offers and benefits worth over £270:

  • Discounts off TES Institute courses
  • Access over 200,000 articles in the TES online archive
  • Free Tastecard membership worth £79.99
  • Discounts with Zipcar,, Virgin Wines and other partners
Order your low-cost subscription today