Towards a better way of funding further education

30th May 1997 at 01:00
Derwentside College senior management team is correct to criticise a funding mechanism that still rewards colleges with low average levels of funding (ALF) if they have achieved this through past practices that are currently frowned upon.

If fairness is sought, however, the assessment of what is high ALF or low ALF itself requires refinement.

Most high ALF colleges are so because of inheritance rather than current operations, so why can't we have a point of convergence (say Pounds 16 per unit) in one year, based on key elements of operation to ensure a level playing field? All the colleges that started off with positive balances and assets could share them out with other colleges like us who inherited deficits and liabilities. This would give us all an equal chance to meet the standard ALF.

I somehow think that there is as much chance of that as there is of David Blunkett winning the election for the Tory leadership.

A final thought: forget about a Pounds 16 ALF. Let us see it at 1p less than sixth forms effectively get.



Sheffield College, Sheffield

Log-in as an existing print or digital subscriber

Forgotten your subscriber ID?


To access this content and the full TES archive, subscribe now.

View subscriber offers


Get TES online and delivered to your door – for less than the price of a coffee

Save 33% off the cover price with this great subscription offer. Every copy delivered to your door by first-class post, plus full access to TES online and the TES app for just £1.90 per week.
Subscribers also enjoy a range of fantastic offers and benefits worth over £270:

  • Discounts off TES Institute courses
  • Access over 200,000 articles in the TES online archive
  • Free Tastecard membership worth £79.99
  • Discounts with Zipcar,, Virgin Wines and other partners
Order your low-cost subscription today