Two words of warning: Northern Ireland

15th July 2005 at 01:00
Just two words state the objection to faith-based schools: Northern Ireland. The segregation of Catholic and Protestant pupils has been one of the major causes and sustainers of intercommunity tensions in that country.

Why have the bitter lessons taught not been learned?

Some people offer another single word: madrassahs. The Islamic religious schools are not automatically terrorist breeding grounds - most are surely not - but they surely can be. Some of Pakistan's madrassahs were Taliban and al-Qaeda factories, which we know because during Afghanistan's war with Russia the United States funded some of them as resistance training grounds.

There are at least three reasons for finding faith-based schooling deeply objectionable. One is that it involves the indoctrination of intellectually defenceless children, and that is a form of abuse. It is no accident that over three-quarters of all faith schools in Britain are primary schools for, as the Jesuits said, "Give me the child until he is seven and I will give you the man."

A responsible curriculum would include a sociological survey of the different religions and their history, leaving pupils to make up their own minds much later whether they are going to believe any of them. Of course the faiths know that the numbers of their votaries would be drastically lowered by this means, since mature consideration of religious claims would persuade very few hitherto unbiased minds. This is precisely why the faiths are so eager to indoctrinate their own children in segregated schools.

The second reason is that although the various faiths currently make common cause in demanding taxpayer support for their schools, and legal protection from criticism or opposition, the inevitability is that since the different faiths intrinsically blaspheme one another, the result of religiously segregated education can only be eventual tensions. A far safer route to national cohesion is secular schooling in which children of all communities are taught together. If their parents wish to subject them to religious instruction they can do it after school hours, or in private schools for which they pay out of their own pockets.

This connects with the third point. Taxpayers' money - my atheist's tax money included - should emphatically not go to support schooling premised on religious beliefs. Religion is a private matter of choice, and it is a profound injustice to force those who disagree with it to pay for children to be indoctrinated in it.

The Government supports faith-based education in order to conciliate religious minorities, and because it hopes better-behaved children will result. Its motives are worthy, but its logic is deeply flawed. Is it too late for it to undo the harm already begun?

A.C. Grayling is professor of philosophy at Birkbeck college, University of London.

Subscribe to get access to the content on this page.

If you are already a Tes/ Tes Scotland subscriber please log in with your username or email address to get full access to our back issues, CPD library and membership plus page.

Not a subscriber? Find out more about our subscription offers.
Subscribe now
Existing subscriber?
Enter subscription number

Comments

The guide by your side – ensuring you are always up to date with the latest in education.

Get Tes magazine online and delivered to your door. Stay up to date with the latest research, teacher innovation and insight, plus classroom tips and techniques with a Tes magazine subscription.
With a Tes magazine subscription you get exclusive access to our CPD library. Including our New Teachers’ special for NQTS, Ed Tech, How to Get a Job, Trip Planner, Ed Biz Special and all Tes back issues.

Subscribe now