'Unfair' marking for new A-levels

25th May 2001 at 01:00
Heads say students taking vocational A-levels in the first year will be judged more harshly than those on AS-levels

STUDENTS taking vocational A-levels units this summer will be marked more strictly than classmates taking the new AS-level, schools and colleges claim.

Headteachers fear that lower sixth formers, who are sitting the first year of the replacement for advanced GNVQs, will be assessed at the A-level, second-year (A2) standard after only a year of study.

By contrast, students sitting exams and completing work for the new AS-levels are marked against the standards expected after a one-year course.

The vocational A-level is a full, two-year course made up of six units that can be studied in any order. The academic, or general, A-level consists of the AS-level, where three units in a set sequence are studied. Students are examined after a year and can then drop the subject or continue it at the second, A2 level.

Chris Henstock, head of Lutterworth grammar school, said: "The problems with the new A-levels have just gone on and on. While the AS-level exams recognise that pupils are sitting the new exam a year early - in Year 12 instead of 13 - there has been a total failure to recognise this fact with vocational A-levels.

"A glaring example of this is in the business studies paper, where students taking the vocational qualification haven't got a hope of answering one particular question about a business projection - it's even above AS-level standards.

"This means that - at a stroke - th opportunities for pupils sitting the supposedly less academic exam have been utterly wiped out."

The TES revealed earlier this year that three-quarters of students failed the first vocational A-level exams sat in January in several subjects.

The poor results were put down to the fact that students were only four months into the course. But schools say that similar failure rates are likely this summer if pupils are judged against the old A-level standards.

One Birmingham teacher claimed that, under the assessment criteria, he would be forced to fail vocational portfolio work that would merit a grade C if it were AS-level.

Schools also worry that chief examiners do not have enough information to determine the grade boundaries for the new AS-level.

Graham Able, a committee chair in the Headmasters' and Headmistresses' Conference and Girls' Schools Association, said: "AS is intermediate between GCSE and A-level. The judgment is about how far a pupil should have gone after one year. We are concerned that technicalgrade boundaries have not been designed tightly enough by the Qualifications and Curriculum Authority."

A QCA spokesman said: "All vocational units are at the same advanced level standard - equivalent to that of the full A-level. While the AS units are graded at a lower standard than the vocational A-level, the A2 units will be graded at a higher standard than the vocational units. The combined effect is that the vocational A-level and full A-levels will be at the same standard."

Subscribe to get access to the content on this page.

If you are already a Tes/ Tes Scotland subscriber please log in with your username or email address to get full access to our back issues, CPD library and membership plus page.

Not a subscriber? Find out more about our subscription offers.
Subscribe now
Existing subscriber?
Enter subscription number


The guide by your side – ensuring you are always up to date with the latest in education.

Get Tes magazine online and delivered to your door. Stay up to date with the latest research, teacher innovation and insight, plus classroom tips and techniques with a Tes magazine subscription.
With a Tes magazine subscription you get exclusive access to our CPD library. Including our New Teachers’ special for NQTS, Ed Tech, How to Get a Job, Trip Planner, Ed Biz Special and all Tes back issues.

Subscribe now