Unions win a poor pay deal

30th June 2006 at 01:00
It was not clear from your piece on proposed new performance management regulations ("Observations limits hailed as "victory," TES, June 16) how they could be hailed as a "great victory for teachers" by the unions that negotiated the changes as part of their social partnership with the Government.

Nigel Middleton, director of Head Support Consultancy, said: "If heads manage to establish proper procedures then it will lead to fewer teachers getting pay awards." So that could not have been the victory, but maybe the unions involved were referring to the three-hour limit on classroom observation.

However, in Croydon last year all unions in the local education authority agreed an observation policy that included a three-hour limit for all observation (including a one-hour limit on performance management observation). So something that the Rewards and Incentive Group unions ratified locally in 2005, but then agreed is worsening by three times in 2006. Can this be claimed a victory?

James Looker President Croydon NUT Forestdale primary school

Log-in as an existing print or digital subscriber

Forgotten your subscriber ID?


To access this content and the full TES archive, subscribe now.

View subscriber offers


Get TES online and delivered to your door – for less than the price of a coffee

Save 33% off the cover price with this great subscription offer. Every copy delivered to your door by first-class post, plus full access to TES online and the TES app for just £1.90 per week.
Subscribers also enjoy a range of fantastic offers and benefits worth over £270:

  • Discounts off TES Institute courses
  • Access over 200,000 articles in the TES online archive
  • Free Tastecard membership worth £79.99
  • Discounts with Zipcar, Buyagift.com, Virgin Wines and other partners
Order your low-cost subscription today