Unions win a poor pay deal

30th June 2006 at 01:00
It was not clear from your piece on proposed new performance management regulations ("Observations limits hailed as "victory," TES, June 16) how they could be hailed as a "great victory for teachers" by the unions that negotiated the changes as part of their social partnership with the Government.

Nigel Middleton, director of Head Support Consultancy, said: "If heads manage to establish proper procedures then it will lead to fewer teachers getting pay awards." So that could not have been the victory, but maybe the unions involved were referring to the three-hour limit on classroom observation.

However, in Croydon last year all unions in the local education authority agreed an observation policy that included a three-hour limit for all observation (including a one-hour limit on performance management observation). So something that the Rewards and Incentive Group unions ratified locally in 2005, but then agreed is worsening by three times in 2006. Can this be claimed a victory?

James Looker President Croydon NUT Forestdale primary school

Subscribe to get access to the content on this page.

If you are already a Tes/ Tes Scotland subscriber please log in with your username or email address to get full access to our back issues, CPD library and membership plus page.

Not a subscriber? Find out more about our subscription offers.
Subscribe now
Existing subscriber?
Enter subscription number


The guide by your side – ensuring you are always up to date with the latest in education.

Get Tes magazine online and delivered to your door. Stay up to date with the latest research, teacher innovation and insight, plus classroom tips and techniques with a Tes magazine subscription.
With a Tes magazine subscription you get exclusive access to our CPD library. Including our New Teachers’ special for NQTS, Ed Tech, How to Get a Job, Trip Planner, Ed Biz Special and all Tes back issues.

Subscribe now