Universities don't care for Ucas form waffle

17th January 2003 at 00:00
Bill Hunter writes that "the significance of the personal statement (on Ucas forms) cannot be underestimated" ("Bad form and good intentions", TES, January 3). He goes on to describe how teachers tweak these to give misleading impressions, and asks:"Do the universities know this?"

The answer is simple: universities do not care much about personal statements. In 10 years of experience doing admissions, I would say that in 99 per cent of cases the decision is made independently of the personal statement, and in well over 50 per cent of cases it is made before the personal statement has been read (if it is read at all).

Heads of sixth form should look at it from our point of view. We are looking for a certain level of academic competence combined with an absence of those character traits which result in a student skipping lectures, failing to write essays, and being otherwise problematic.

Very occasionally a statement will explain why a student has under-performed (eg a bereavement in the exam period), and sometimes it will unintentionally reveal negative character traits, but the rest of the time it says nothing of interest at all.

So here are some tips:

* Keep it short: the easier it is to assimilate, the more likely it is to have an impact. The ability to combine brevity and clarity is very impressive.

* Use a 12-point font and double line spacing, since the Ucas form will be scanned, reduced and photocopied several times before it gets to an admissions tutor.

* Keep it as factual as possible. Unjustified or undefended opinions are exactly what we are trying to discourage at university.

* Extra-curricular activities are only good if combined with academic achievement. To be frank, we would rather accept someone who does nothing but work and gets a First, than someone who plays sport for her country but gets a 2.2.

* Be plausible in what you claim to have read - it is better to have read and understood an introductory book than to have ploughed through a classic and learnt nothing from the experience.

Dr TWC Stoneham Department of philosophy University of York

Log-in as an existing print or digital subscriber

Forgotten your subscriber ID?


To access this content and the full TES archive, subscribe now.

View subscriber offers


Get TES online and delivered to your door – for less than the price of a coffee

Save 33% off the cover price with this great subscription offer. Every copy delivered to your door by first-class post, plus full access to TES online and the TES app for just £1.90 per week.
Subscribers also enjoy a range of fantastic offers and benefits worth over £270:

  • Discounts off TES Institute courses
  • Access over 200,000 articles in the TES online archive
  • Free Tastecard membership worth £79.99
  • Discounts with Zipcar, Buyagift.com, Virgin Wines and other partners
Order your low-cost subscription today