The very definition of delusion

3rd January 2014 at 00:00

If, as Colin Richards suggests, educational quality is truly "indefinable" ("Quality can be tested? Wrong answer", Letters, 2027 December) then, by definition, there can be no meaningful discussion of the concept - we cannot understand, control or improve it. If, however, key aspects can be sufficiently well described then measurement instruments (not necessarily "tests") can yield data to inform our discussions and shape our decisions. Without such data we have only opinions. From the same side of the divide, Mervyn Benford cites six factors that he says "are the essence of effective learning". Is this his opinion or based on verifiable data obtained through evaluation? If the former, then it warrants no more credence than anybody else's proposition. If the latter, then it both negates his specific challenge to me and proves my general point - if a construct can be defined then it has the potential to be measured.

George Bethell, Director, Anglia Assessment.

Log-in as an existing print or digital subscriber

Forgotten your subscriber ID?


To access this content and the full TES archive, subscribe now.

View subscriber offers


Get TES online and delivered to your door – for less than the price of a coffee

Save 33% off the cover price with this great subscription offer. Every copy delivered to your door by first-class post, plus full access to TES online and the TES app for just £1.90 per week.
Subscribers also enjoy a range of fantastic offers and benefits worth over £270:

  • Discounts off TES Institute courses
  • Access over 200,000 articles in the TES online archive
  • Free Tastecard membership worth £79.99
  • Discounts with Zipcar,, Virgin Wines and other partners
Order your low-cost subscription today