We don't want more change
The new Curriculum 2000 has received public backing. As the political backing was not there to move towards the more radical over-arching national diploma recommended by Lord Dearing, the alternative model of a fully modularised post-16 accredited system was seen to be a move in the right direction.
Teachers worked very hard towards the three modules for the A1 and three for A2. Unlike the key skills initiative, schoolteachers found planning time was rushed, new A-level textbooks were not available, exemplar mark schemes were rudimentary and the full implications of hundreds of new modular exams, alongside the already crowded examination schedule of key stage 3, GCSE and A-level gradually unfolded.
Ms Morris cannot wave a wand and expect teachers and students to immediately change schemes of work and detailed departmental planning built around the present modular framework, for a new one based on her own political response to the recent "national outcry".
In my college, one of the most disheartening aspects is the amount of money that schools and colleges hand over in exam fees. Schools do not have the extra money to meet the spiralling costs of module entries, re-entries and no doubt script re-marks, that will follow the publication of results in August.
Ministers should stand back - look at what is good in the system, discuss carefully the outcomes with all the major stake-holders and not rush in with another lot of new changes.
Beacon community college Crowborough