Why Charles Darwin School wants a change of formula

28th June 1996 at 01:00
When Charles Darwin School opted out in 1992, it was seeking independence from its lea and, perhaps, a little extra money. For the first two years it was marginally better off, although not by much because Bromley Council already delegated a large percentage of its potential schools budget.

Since 1994, however, all GM secondaries in the south London borough have been subject to the common funding formula and governors at Charles Darwin cannot wait to see the back of it.

According to chair of governors, Mervin Sharp, the CFF has led to greater confusion over how the school's budget is calculated, with Bromley and the Funding Agency for Schools frequently locked into disputes over figures provided by the council, including a wrangle over pupil projections which was decided in the courts.

Headteacher Rob Higgins agrees. "The formula has never been the same two years running. It was supposed to make things transparent but in reality it's still semi-opaque."

The CFF is calculated by taking Bromley's standard spending assessment for schools, which is just under Pounds 100 million, and subtracting the percentage the LEA may retain for spending on all schools for such things as statemented children and transport. Since 1994, this "top-slice" has increased from about 13 per cent to 18.8 per cent so that, in 1996-97, just over Pounds 80 million was left for schools within and outside local authority control.

The primary:secondary split in Bromley is about 45:55 and this year 17 secondary schools (all but one of which are GM) are entitled to a total of Pounds 44.3 million. Charles Darwin receives just over Pounds 2.5 million, based on four core factors - age-weighted pupil units, special needs pupils without statements, free school meals and fixed costs.

"It's a complex method and the top slice is difficult to understand," says Mr Sharp. "There is no way that the school can realistically check whether it's fair. "

According to Mr Sharp, the CFF is not common but unique to each LEA. In recent years, Bromley has adjusted its age-weighted pupil units so the primary sector is better off at the expense of secondary schools.

Mr Higgins explains: "Because it had encouraged secondaries to opt out, Bromley was in a position to change the AWPUs and increase funding to primary schools which remain under the LEA."

Mr Sharp hopes a national formula will allow the school to plan ahead by giving it more insight into how much money it will receive from one year to the next.

"But the problem with any formula is that there is no mechanism to reflect a particular school's problems. I wonder if there needs to be a better bidding system for the different pots of money."

Mr Higgins, meanwhile, can see political repercussions for the Government if GM budgets no longer reflect spending within a local authority. "At present the Government and local authorities can play one another off over who is really responsible," he says. "If we went for a NFF and schools were funded directly, we would know whose door to knock on when they were complaints of under-funding."

Log-in as an existing print or digital subscriber

Forgotten your subscriber ID?


To access this content and the full TES archive, subscribe now.

View subscriber offers


Get TES online and delivered to your door – for less than the price of a coffee

Save 33% off the cover price with this great subscription offer. Every copy delivered to your door by first-class post, plus full access to TES online and the TES app for just £1.90 per week.
Subscribers also enjoy a range of fantastic offers and benefits worth over £270:

  • Discounts off TES Institute courses
  • Access over 200,000 articles in the TES online archive
  • Free Tastecard membership worth £79.99
  • Discounts with Zipcar, Buyagift.com, Virgin Wines and other partners
Order your low-cost subscription today