Why do the unions bother?;Letter

10th April 1998 at 01:00
As a probationary teacher I have to thank you for saving me about pound;100 a year by highlighting (March 13) how ineffective the teaching unions have been in fighting for teachers' pay rights, winning only one battle in 26 years.

The following week one of the unions distributed a leaflet claiming that teachers in Scotland are falling behind not only their European counterparts but also other graduates in this country. I read this to mean that the unions are admitting failure for having allowed such a situation to arise, although this was not the explicit message of the leaflet.

One highly placed union insider was reported recently in The Scotsman as saying that the current pay claim "doesn't have a snowball's chance in hell". Why bother then?

The 4 per cent success rate in pay claims is not enough to make me join. The unions'primary purpose is as a buffer against any false allegations that can be made against teachers. Perhaps this explains why the fall in salaries has been allowed to occur. I think I'll take my chances and not further reduce my salary by pound;100.

Angus MacNeil Bentalla Crescent, Salen, Mull

Log-in as an existing print or digital subscriber

Forgotten your subscriber ID?


To access this content and the full TES archive, subscribe now.

View subscriber offers


Get TES online and delivered to your door – for less than the price of a coffee

Save 33% off the cover price with this great subscription offer. Every copy delivered to your door by first-class post, plus full access to TES online and the TES app for just £1.90 per week.
Subscribers also enjoy a range of fantastic offers and benefits worth over £270:

  • Discounts off TES Institute courses
  • Access over 200,000 articles in the TES online archive
  • Free Tastecard membership worth £79.99
  • Discounts with Zipcar, Buyagift.com, Virgin Wines and other partners
Order your low-cost subscription today