Will children's education benefit?;Letter

23rd July 1999 at 01:00
YOUR article on the long summer holiday (Friday magazine, July 9) opts for a confrontational approach rather than one that values sound debate about educational advantage. Although it does report the favourable views of one parent towards the five-term year, it makes no attempt to acknow-ledge or review other, more objective, evidence.

It picks up on the union-inspired line that "teachers work longer days than outsiders imagine" but the article fails to put the point that most teachers who have experience of the five-term year claim that it reduces stress.

The article fails to challenge the "perk" mentality of a minority section of the teaching force - a mentality that has consistently helped to de-professionalise teachers in the eyes of the public. Most culpably, the article is short on delineating improvements to pupil learning - which are the issue.

Trevor Kerry

15 Lady Bower Close

North Hykeham, Lincoln

Log-in as an existing print or digital subscriber

Forgotten your subscriber ID?


To access this content and the full TES archive, subscribe now.

View subscriber offers


Get TES online and delivered to your door – for less than the price of a coffee

Save 33% off the cover price with this great subscription offer. Every copy delivered to your door by first-class post, plus full access to TES online and the TES app for just £1.90 per week.
Subscribers also enjoy a range of fantastic offers and benefits worth over £270:

  • Discounts off TES Institute courses
  • Access over 200,000 articles in the TES online archive
  • Free Tastecard membership worth £79.99
  • Discounts with Zipcar, Buyagift.com, Virgin Wines and other partners
Order your low-cost subscription today