Winners take all

28th October 1994 at 00:00
Financial constraints and duplications have prompted many college mergers. The trend for hard-pressed colleges to seek mergers is likely to be revealed by the first full financial results for the FE sector to be published since incorporation.

The accounts, which must be presented to the Further Education Funding Council by the end of November, will give the first official indication of how the 500 colleges in England and Wales have fared since going independent in April 1993.

The FEFC will prepare an analysis of a 16-month period ending in July this year. This will be published early next year, although no decision has yet been taken on whether individual college accounts will be made public.

But leaders of college associations fear the accounts will reveal a bleak outlook over the next two to three years, with many smaller colleges, particularly those in cities already well served by FE institutions, being forced to seek mergers as a solution to their financial problems.

Dave Gibson, president of the Association of Principals of Colleges, says that colleges which have inherited deficits or missed enrolment targets could find themselves in a downward spiral.

"There has been considerable encouragement to increase numbers by a quarter over three years, at the same time as keeping a tight grip on costs. If colleges have inherited deficits they have started off at a distinct disadvantage."

The competition to increase numbers from a relatively static pool of students will inevitably lead to some losers, he adds.

Small colleges are particularly vulnerable, as they cannot always compete with larger institutions for increased student numbers and often rely on existing staff to keep their books rather than employ financial specialists.

The grim outlook of straitened financial circumstances, mergers and the consequent staff redundancies reflects the haste with which FE college independence has been introduced, Mr Gibson says.

But John Bevan, secretary of the Association for Colleges, feels that independence has worked well for the vast majority of colleges at the "broad policy level". However, difficulties in working out the transfer of assets and liabilities - which is at the root of some deficits - should have been foreseen.

No more than five colleges are facing serious deficits - and of these several relate to disputes which predated incorporation, such as at Coventry Technical College.

"A handful are in or facing serious deficits," says Mr Bevan. "The reasons vary, but in total the number adds up to no more than 1 per cent of all institutions."

He agrees that the more serious issue for the sector is the number steering a fine line between breaking even and deficit. "It's these colleges which are awaiting this month's enrolment figures. Those which have been running a tight ship but miss their targets could find themselves in difficulties."

For most colleges, says Mr Bevan, the biggest financial worries have been disputes over the transfer of legal liabilities, such as compensation for injuries sustained on the premises, or liabilities attached to land or buildings. (Legal action and two court cases have established that liabilities for compensation incurred before incorporation - for example, where a member of staff has been injured but the compensation not agreed until late - are not the responsibility of colleges.) But where land or buildings have been transferred with a liability, such as an order to carry out repair work, the law is still unclear and local authorities could argue that colleges are responsible for such bills, he adds.

College finances are based upon a complex formula related to student units with tariffs varied according to the length and type of courses and the numbers of students. FEFC grants typically account for between 75 and 85 per cent of budgets, with the rest made up through fees and income.

"Broadly speaking, the arrangements for transition were right - where it went wrong was because of local difficulties. These have arisen either from inadequate record-keeping or from a genuine debate over who was liable for certain costs."


Nick Holdsworth

Log-in as an existing print or digital subscriber

Forgotten your subscriber ID?


To access this content and the full TES archive, subscribe now.

View subscriber offers


Get TES online and delivered to your door – for less than the price of a coffee

Save 33% off the cover price with this great subscription offer. Every copy delivered to your door by first-class post, plus full access to TES online and the TES app for just £1.90 per week.
Subscribers also enjoy a range of fantastic offers and benefits worth over £270:

  • Discounts off TES Institute courses
  • Access over 200,000 articles in the TES online archive
  • Free Tastecard membership worth £79.99
  • Discounts with Zipcar,, Virgin Wines and other partners
Order your low-cost subscription today