Woolly thinking on assessment

29th September 2006 at 01:00
Congratulations to future English, science and history A-level students. In these subjects they will continue to have opportunities to demonstrate a broad range of their capabilities. Those attainments best assessed through coursework will complement those tested in formal examinations.

As a result, these students' results will be fairer. As a bonus, they are also likely to experience more interesting courses and the skills they develop through coursework will prepare them well for university study and future employment.

What is unclear is why the Qualifications and Curriculum Authority considers internal assessment can be made to work in a few select disciplines but not in others. Why is coursework an acceptable form of assessment for scientific and historical enquiry, but not for geographical enquiry?

Or does the QCA consider plagiarism to be more likely in geography than in English, or teachers less competent to prevent it? This is an arbitrary decision with no clear educational rationale that owes little to the real needs of students.

Dr John Hopkin

Chair, education committee Geographical Association


Log-in as an existing print or digital subscriber

Forgotten your subscriber ID?


To access this content and the full TES archive, subscribe now.

View subscriber offers


Get TES online and delivered to your door – for less than the price of a coffee

Save 33% off the cover price with this great subscription offer. Every copy delivered to your door by first-class post, plus full access to TES online and the TES app for just £1.90 per week.
Subscribers also enjoy a range of fantastic offers and benefits worth over £270:

  • Discounts off TES Institute courses
  • Access over 200,000 articles in the TES online archive
  • Free Tastecard membership worth £79.99
  • Discounts with Zipcar, Buyagift.com, Virgin Wines and other partners
Order your low-cost subscription today