Wragg sins

10th May 1996 at 01:00
Even by his own standards, Ted Wragg's diatribe against the Office for Standards in Education (TES, April 19) or, to be more precise, against those who conduct the inspections, is grossly unfair.

Wragg commits the same sin of which he has accused chief inspector Chris Woodhead - that is, of extrapolation to the whole of the process from just a few examples. Inspectors may be a lot of things but a "prat" is unlikely to be one of them, just as there are unlikely to be "15,000 failing teachers".

The comment, "Wait until some traditionalist is given a grade 7 by a trendy inspector for spending too much time on spelling", is flawed on several counts and leads one to assume that either he fails to understand the inspection process or that a cheap laugh is worth the abandonment of objectivity.

I am a great fan of Professor Wragg but I would not wish to see the force of his view demeaned by inaccurate and biased comment. Leave that to the politicians!

S W Hannath Headteacher (and OFSTED team inspector) St. Bartholomew's Church of England school Wootton Bassett Swindon Wiltshire

Subscribe to get access to the content on this page.

If you are already a Tes/ Tes Scotland subscriber please log in with your username or email address to get full access to our back issues, CPD library and membership plus page.

Not a subscriber? Find out more about our subscription offers.
Subscribe now
Existing subscriber?
Enter subscription number

Comments

The guide by your side – ensuring you are always up to date with the latest in education.

Get Tes magazine online and delivered to your door. Stay up to date with the latest research, teacher innovation and insight, plus classroom tips and techniques with a Tes magazine subscription.
With a Tes magazine subscription you get exclusive access to our CPD library. Including our New Teachers’ special for NQTS, Ed Tech, How to Get a Job, Trip Planner, Ed Biz Special and all Tes back issues.

Subscribe now