Writer's toolkit

21st November 2003 at 00:00
As you may have noticed, both of us have beards, so we could fairly be described as "bearded" - two bearded grammar-enthusiasts, if you like. You could even describe one of us as grey-bearded. Our ears may be odd-shaped (we don't know), and if you think we're a bit simple-minded then please keep your pointed remarks to yourself.

A lot of English adjectives are built by adding - ed to a noun: grey-bearded, odd-shaped, simple-minded, pointed. The result means "havingI", so bearded people have beards, odd-shaped things have an odd shape, simple-minded people have simple minds and pointed remarks have a point.

These adjectives are worth some attention at key stage 3 because they're so efficient. The single word "grey-bearded" carries all the meaning of a "with" phrase ("with a grey beard") or even a whole relative clause ("who has a grey beard"). Just the job if you're trying to give the maximum of descriptive information in the minimum of words: "The leather-jacketed grammarian sat at his oak-panelled desk humming quietly to himself in a good-humoured way." There are three other reasons for exploring these adjectives: lConveniently, there's a negative equivalent of the "ed" suffix that means "not havingI". This is "less", as in "mindless", "shapeless", "pointless" and so on. You could even have "beardless" - but more on that below.

lTheir grammar is rather strange, because the noun often brings a modifier with it - "odd-shaped" is based on "odd shape" and "one-eyed" on "one eye".

Suffixes don't usually allow this. For example, "ful" has a rather similar meaning to "ed", so "successful" means "having success", but we can't say "great successful" to mean "having great success". Think of "ed" as a particularly broad-minded affix which isn't as fussy as most about the company it keeps - very useful for describing five-legged bug-eyed blue-bearded (whoops - we're getting carried away again) monsters at KS3.

lThere are interesting limits on the kinds of meanings that you can express in this way. We may be bearded, but we're not eyed or nosed or headed although we do in fact have eyes and noses and heads. This isn't because you can't add "ed" to these nouns - you can, but if you do it needs a modifier: one-eyed, red-nosed, long-headed. Why? Because everyone has eyes, noses and heads, but not everyone has one eye, a red nose or a long head.

And why is "bearded" so much more natural than "beardless"? Because not everyone has a beard. So you only deserve an "ed" adjective if its meaning is distinctive, if it picks you out from the crowd. This is a good way into talking about cultural stereotypes.

See what other examples they can think of, and then get them to invent some that might exist, but don't: great-rhythmed, many-goaled and, on the subject of flattery, good-teachered.

Richard Hudson is professor of linguistics at University College, London Geoff Barton is headteacher of King Edward VI School, Bury St Edmunds, Suffolk

Log-in as an existing print or digital subscriber

Forgotten your subscriber ID?


To access this content and the full TES archive, subscribe now.

View subscriber offers


Get TES online and delivered to your door – for less than the price of a coffee

Save 33% off the cover price with this great subscription offer. Every copy delivered to your door by first-class post, plus full access to TES online and the TES app for just £1.90 per week.
Subscribers also enjoy a range of fantastic offers and benefits worth over £270:

  • Discounts off TES Institute courses
  • Access over 200,000 articles in the TES online archive
  • Free Tastecard membership worth £79.99
  • Discounts with Zipcar, Buyagift.com, Virgin Wines and other partners
Order your low-cost subscription today