The wrong chemistry;Letter

13th August 1999 at 01:00
DOUGLAS WEIR gives only one side of the story in saying that integrated teaching is the only option (TESS, July 30). I agree that pupils probably meet too many teachers in S1-S2 and as a science teacher I enjoy teaching biology and chemistry as well as my own subject of physics.

I have no doubt, however, that I teach physics topics better. This is not because I lack the knowledge to teach biology and chemistry at S1-S2 levels but that I lack, on occasions, the little extras which can be used to catch pupils' imaginations or to be more spontaneous and more able to move off at a tangent if required. A move towards integration does have costs.

Is it not odd that this change is being promoted at a time when Higher Still is being introduced? Could it possibly be that another reason for integration is the need for more flexibility on timetabling given the needs of the new S5-S6 curriculum?

Findlay Rush, Lathro Park, Kinross

Subscribe to get access to the content on this page.

If you are already a Tes/ Tes Scotland subscriber please log in with your username or email address to get full access to our back issues, CPD library and membership plus page.

Not a subscriber? Find out more about our subscription offers.
Subscribe now
Existing subscriber?
Enter subscription number

Comments

The guide by your side – ensuring you are always up to date with the latest in education.

Get Tes magazine online and delivered to your door. Stay up to date with the latest research, teacher innovation and insight, plus classroom tips and techniques with a Tes magazine subscription.
With a Tes magazine subscription you get exclusive access to our CPD library. Including our New Teachers’ special for NQTS, Ed Tech, How to Get a Job, Trip Planner, Ed Biz Special and all Tes back issues.

Subscribe now