Wrong measure of Sure Start

22nd April 2005 at 01:00
The article "Can we be sure it works ?" (TES April 15) (about the Sure Start programme for under-fives and their families in deprived areas) reminds me of the folly that informs too many official evaluations and inspections: the folly of concentrating on "products" to the exclusion of "processes".

Sure Start may or may not have met its four clear measurable targets (or products) but the prime criterion for its evaluation should be whether or not it is enhancing the quality of life now for very young children and their parents.

If the processes involved in Sure Start are accomplishing this, then in my book the programme has to be judged a success. It requires no further justification in terms of meeting spurious, measurable targets.

Professor Colin Richards 1 Bobbin Mill Spark Bridge, Cumbria

Subscribe to get access to the content on this page.

If you are already a Tes/ Tes Scotland subscriber please log in with your username or email address to get full access to our back issues, CPD library and membership plus page.

Not a subscriber? Find out more about our subscription offers.
Subscribe now
Existing subscriber?
Enter subscription number

Comments

The guide by your side – ensuring you are always up to date with the latest in education.

Get Tes magazine online and delivered to your door. Stay up to date with the latest research, teacher innovation and insight, plus classroom tips and techniques with a Tes magazine subscription.
With a Tes magazine subscription you get exclusive access to our CPD library. Including our New Teachers’ special for NQTS, Ed Tech, How to Get a Job, Trip Planner, Ed Biz Special and all Tes back issues.

Subscribe now