Wrong measure of Sure Start

22nd April 2005 at 01:00
The article "Can we be sure it works ?" (TES April 15) (about the Sure Start programme for under-fives and their families in deprived areas) reminds me of the folly that informs too many official evaluations and inspections: the folly of concentrating on "products" to the exclusion of "processes".

Sure Start may or may not have met its four clear measurable targets (or products) but the prime criterion for its evaluation should be whether or not it is enhancing the quality of life now for very young children and their parents.

If the processes involved in Sure Start are accomplishing this, then in my book the programme has to be judged a success. It requires no further justification in terms of meeting spurious, measurable targets.

Professor Colin Richards 1 Bobbin Mill Spark Bridge, Cumbria

Log-in as an existing print or digital subscriber

Forgotten your subscriber ID?


To access this content and the full TES archive, subscribe now.

View subscriber offers


Get TES online and delivered to your door – for less than the price of a coffee

Save 33% off the cover price with this great subscription offer. Every copy delivered to your door by first-class post, plus full access to TES online and the TES app for just £1.90 per week.
Subscribers also enjoy a range of fantastic offers and benefits worth over £270:

  • Discounts off TES Institute courses
  • Access over 200,000 articles in the TES online archive
  • Free Tastecard membership worth £79.99
  • Discounts with Zipcar, Buyagift.com, Virgin Wines and other partners
Order your low-cost subscription today