Year 6 repeated

7th September 2007 at 01:00
One of the dafter ideas to emerge from politicians is David Cameron's proposal that failing Year 6 pupils should repeat their last year at primary school. What effect will repeating a year have on pupils' self- esteem and motivation damaged already by "only" having achieved level 2 or 3?

Will it make them more or (more likely) much less amenable to school discipline at age 12, and even more so two or three years later? How will the extra influx be accommodated in schools by Ofsted in inspections and by the Department for Children, Schools and Families in performance tables ? How will Conservative parents react to their children being "held back"? How will secondaries react? Will they too be able to require pupils to repeat a year or more, or perhaps be able to send back their poorly performing Year 7 or 8 pupils for an extra dose of primary education?

There are some sensible proposals for improvements to education emerging from the Conservatives' policy review group, but these may be overshadowed by the publicity given to this retrograde proposal.

Professor Colin Richards

Spark Bridge,

Cumbria

Log-in as an existing print or digital subscriber

Forgotten your subscriber ID?

Subscribe

To access this content and the full TES archive, subscribe now.

View subscriber offers

Comments

Get TES online and delivered to your door – for less than the price of a coffee

Save 33% off the cover price with this great subscription offer. Every copy delivered to your door by first-class post, plus full access to TES online and the TES app for just £1.90 per week.
 
Subscribers also enjoy a range of fantastic offers and benefits worth over £270:

  • Discounts off TES Institute courses
  • Access over 200,000 articles in the TES online archive
  • Free Tastecard membership worth £79.99
  • Discounts with Zipcar, Buyagift.com, Virgin Wines and other partners
Order your low-cost subscription today