Year 6 repeated

7th September 2007 at 01:00
One of the dafter ideas to emerge from politicians is David Cameron's proposal that failing Year 6 pupils should repeat their last year at primary school. What effect will repeating a year have on pupils' self- esteem and motivation damaged already by "only" having achieved level 2 or 3?

Will it make them more or (more likely) much less amenable to school discipline at age 12, and even more so two or three years later? How will the extra influx be accommodated in schools by Ofsted in inspections and by the Department for Children, Schools and Families in performance tables ? How will Conservative parents react to their children being "held back"? How will secondaries react? Will they too be able to require pupils to repeat a year or more, or perhaps be able to send back their poorly performing Year 7 or 8 pupils for an extra dose of primary education?

There are some sensible proposals for improvements to education emerging from the Conservatives' policy review group, but these may be overshadowed by the publicity given to this retrograde proposal.

Professor Colin Richards

Spark Bridge,


Subscribe to get access to the content on this page.

If you are already a Tes/ Tes Scotland subscriber please log in with your username or email address to get full access to our back issues, CPD library and membership plus page.

Not a subscriber? Find out more about our subscription offers.
Subscribe now
Existing subscriber?
Enter subscription number


The guide by your side – ensuring you are always up to date with the latest in education.

Get Tes magazine online and delivered to your door. Stay up to date with the latest research, teacher innovation and insight, plus classroom tips and techniques with a Tes magazine subscription.
With a Tes magazine subscription you get exclusive access to our CPD library. Including our New Teachers’ special for NQTS, Ed Tech, How to Get a Job, Trip Planner, Ed Biz Special and all Tes back issues.

Subscribe now