Yet another form

15th January 2010 at 00:00

Sunita Grigg ("Staff must set a CPD example", Letters, January 8) misunderstands the reason for people's reluctance to declare their CPD to the Institute for Learning (IfL). It isn't that they are against CPD, it is just that it is difficult to see the point of this requirement.

What is the IfL going to do with the information? Has it got the staff to do anything constructive with the thousands of records they will receive? Can they do anything more than file them away?

The last thing lecturers need from their professional body is more pointless form filling. The IfL should be campaigning against such non- productive procedures.

The situation cannot be compared, as Sunita does, with other professions such as law or medicine. These areas have an established, recognised, high-quality system of CPD that bears little resemblance to the mishmash on offer in FE. The IfL should concentrate on improving our CPD, not tallying it.

John Linfoot, Bournemouth.

Subscribe to get access to the content on this page.

If you are already a Tes/ Tes Scotland subscriber please log in with your username or email address to get full access to our back issues, CPD library and membership plus page.

Not a subscriber? Find out more about our subscription offers.
Subscribe now
Existing subscriber?
Enter subscription number


The guide by your side – ensuring you are always up to date with the latest in education.

Get Tes magazine online and delivered to your door. Stay up to date with the latest research, teacher innovation and insight, plus classroom tips and techniques with a Tes magazine subscription.
With a Tes magazine subscription you get exclusive access to our CPD library. Including our New Teachers’ special for NQTS, Ed Tech, How to Get a Job, Trip Planner, Ed Biz Special and all Tes back issues.

Subscribe now