I was disappointed with a number of points raised in last week’s article, “Poor students more likely to opt for subjects that entrench inequality”.
I am faculty head of business, computing, design and technology in a very mixed catchment school, with high achieving learners from all 10 deciles; data show that there is no disparity between the results my pupils achieve, their ambitions and their background. My subjects do not entrench inequality.
The research quoted makes several references to “traditional subjects” and “academic subjects”. I find this to be elitist and outdated. The article does not make it clear that the original research is based on the Russell Group’s Informed Choices (which contains only 24 of the UK’s 163 universities). It also fails to mention the great work being carried out around developing the workforce and the many routes into university today.
Linking parental social class to “traditional subjects” is also unhelpful. If we are to close the attainment gap, we need to equip young people with the skills and qualifications relevant to today’s workforce. Telling young people that “dropping academic subjects is detrimental to their prospects” will not achieve that aim.
Head of business and technologies, Stirling High School
Short and tweet
Walcome tae the warld frae the Scrievership. There’ll be a gey wheen o Scots content tae report frae @natlibscot atween noo an Sept 2017.
“Scots is English in its underwear. It’s difficult to be pretentious in a language like that.” Happy birthday, William McIlvanney!
“We’re going to make learning fun!” said teacher. The class bowed their heads in silence, steeling themselves for the awfulness to come.
Productivity is watching six episodes of The X-Files and marking 30 third-year assessments
One last practice before we go to see Jack and the Beanstalk. #Excited P1s
I’m beginning to think I’m the only person in the world who doesn’t have a blog!
Kilt for Kids tomorrow…wear some tartan with your uniform!