Underground flood

18th March 2005, 12:00am

Share

Underground flood

https://www.tes.com/magazine/archive/underground-flood
In the early years of the 20th century, engineers began constructing a labyrinth of freight tunnels 40 feet below the streets of downtown Chicago. By 1909, some 62 miles of tunnel were open, complete with miniature railway, and shafts connecting to all the major businesses.

But out of sight is out of mind, and when the system ceased operating in 1969, the abandoned tunnels were forgotten by all but cable engineers.

And then, one Monday morning in 1992, the lights began going out all over the city.

Six months previously, cable-layers had come across an alarming sight where one tunnel passed under the Chicago River. A pile had pierced the tunnel roof and river mud was slowly forming a mound at its base. They videotaped the scene and sent the tape to City Hall. But having made its way to the relevant official, it lay in his desk drawer, forgotten like the tunnels themselves.

Another official, whose job it was to inspect the piling works, later admitted that he had not done so because he “couldn’t find parking”.

And so the water continued to drip into the tunnel - until April 13, when the city’s luck ran out and the trickle became a torrent. By 7am, basements and sub-basements were filled with water 40 feet deep. And since the basement is where electrical, heating and air-conditioning equipment is located - not to mention valuable paintings in the case of the Institute of Art - the consequences were devastating.

Soon, downtown Chicago found itself without power. Office workers were trapped in lifts, the subway system was closed and radio and television stations were off the air.

Meanwhile, engineers were trying frantically to plug the hole in the river bed, at one point throwing hundreds of mattresses into the whirlpool.

Eventually, a team of mining divers sealed off the tunnel on either side of the breach, and the long job of pumping out the floodwater began. Even longer, though, was the job of counting the cost of the disaster. At $2 billion, it may well have exceeded that of Chicago’s great fire of 1871.

Want to keep reading for free?

Register with Tes and you can read two free articles every month plus you'll have access to our range of award-winning newsletters.

Keep reading for just £1 per month

You've reached your limit of free articles this month. Subscribe for £1 per month for three months and get:

  • Unlimited access to all Tes magazine content
  • Exclusive subscriber-only stories
  • Award-winning email newsletters
Recent
Most read
Most shared