Skip to main content

Verdict: unfair

My local crown court summoned me for jury service on Monday, July 31 (week two of the summer holiday). I applied for deferment because of family commitments and need for holiday time. I was very anxious about losing all or part of my holiday; this is almost certain to have a detrimental effect on both my teaching and my family life.

I was given a second date in October (half-term holiday). I pointed out that this overlooked the reasons for my original deferment (Section 9A of the Jurors Act should therefore not apply) and I received a letter from the jury officer in which he makes it very clear that the dates were deliberately picked to coincide with my holiday. Teachers are not in a position to switch the dates of their holidays and are particularly vulnerable to this kind of encroachment.

The letter states: "We deferred you to the date given in October with a view (to) not inconveniencing your teaching activities in term-time."

This seems well-meaning at first glance, but I suspect that the wording is contrived to make the alternative option to the loss of holiday seem like work evasion. This is establishing a dangerous precedent. Teachers may lose entire holidays without adequate compensation or support. The jury officer can identify teachers after the random summons and target their holiday time (time for long-term planning and marking as well as well-deserved rest).

I find it difficult to accept that I should surrender my hard-earned holiday because the jury officer has deliberately chosen the pre-determined school holiday period. I wonder whether this is a cost-saving exercise or perhaps just the wilful misunderstanding of one individual at the courts?

ANDREW TAYLOR 17 St Leonard's Avenue, Exeter

Log in or register for FREE to continue reading.

It only takes a moment and you'll get access to more news, plus courses, jobs and teaching resources tailored to you