Vocational is not second class

29th October 2004, 1:00am

Share

Vocational is not second class

https://www.tes.com/magazine/archive/vocational-not-second-class
Even before Tomlinson was published, we were already hearing that the vocational options of the new diploma will be “for the less academic pupils”.

I trust we can hit this on the head from the word “go”. Vocational courses, with full equivalence to their non-vocational counterparts, are not aimed at the less academic. They are an alternative route for all pupils, provided for those who have already decided on a career area - or at least to learn from studying the area - and who perhaps, after nine or 11 years of studying “purer” subjects, are not switched on by the thought of more of the same.

The options which are there for the “less academic” pupils are the different course levels, not the choice between vocational and non-vocational

Dave Alderson

PR manager

Sparsholt college

Hampshire

Want to keep reading for free?

Register with Tes and you can read two free articles every month plus you'll have access to our range of award-winning newsletters.

Keep reading for just £1 per month

You've reached your limit of free articles this month. Subscribe for £1 per month for three months and get:

  • Unlimited access to all Tes magazine content
  • Exclusive subscriber-only stories
  • Award-winning email newsletters
Recent
Most read
Most shared