Myth: recycled paper is poorer quality and more expensive than virgin paper

5th May 2006, 1:00am

Share

Myth: recycled paper is poorer quality and more expensive than virgin paper

https://www.tes.com/magazine/archive/myth-recycled-paper-poorer-quality-and-more-expensive-virgin-paper
TES books editor Geraldine Brennan on the inside literary track

Myth: recycled paper is poorer quality and more expensive than virgin paper, and more damaging to the environment than non-chlorine bleached paper from sustainable forests. More myths and a guide to green publishing can be found at www.twig.uk.com, which contains advice for publishers on finding environmentally friendly paper and printers and is collecting good practice case studies: so far the only one on the site is Egmont, whose moves towards low-impact printing were featured in Friday magazine (November 18, 2005).

Twig is supported by the World Wide Fund for Nature, Greenpeace and Friends of the Earth, and includes information on energy-saving for small-scale publishing projects (such as the kind that goes on in schools): avoid areas of solid colour (hard to de-ink) and metallic or fluorescent ink (petroleum-based); stitch or staple rather than glue; envelopes with windows can only be recycled commercially if they are cellulose. Or stick a recyclable address label over the window, and have a guilt-free weekend.

Want to keep reading for free?

Register with Tes and you can read two free articles every month plus you'll have access to our range of award-winning newsletters.

Keep reading for just £1 per month

You've reached your limit of free articles this month. Subscribe for £1 per month for three months and get:

  • Unlimited access to all Tes magazine content
  • Exclusive subscriber-only stories
  • Award-winning email newsletters
Recent
Most read
Most shared