6 ways Covid has hit poorer pupils the hardest

The disproportionate impact of the pandemic on certain children is clear from the Scottish Budget
28th January 2021, 5:25pm

Share

6 ways Covid has hit poorer pupils the hardest

https://www.tes.com/magazine/archived/6-ways-covid-has-hit-poorer-pupils-hardest
Two Small Children, Standing By A Window

As finance minister Kate Forbes delivered the Scottish Budget today, a number of documents were published - including one that lays bare the impact of the Covid-19 pandemic on pupils from the poorest backgrounds.

The Equality and Fairer Scotland Budget Statement includes analysis of how Covid has, in a number of ways, done most damage to the lives of certain children and young people:

1. Attainment

While it was already clear before Covid that “gaps in educational attainment persist throughout the school years and beyond”, pupils’ “learning experiences changed dramatically during the pandemic, and developing evidence suggest [sic] that the impacts of this have been greater for already disadvantaged groups”.


Scottish Budget 2021: Real-terms pay freeze lets down teachers, says union

Equity audit: Pupils in P1 and S1 among worst hit by Covid lockdown

Review of remote learning: What you need to know

The first lockdown: What was life really like for pupils in lockdown?

Attainment gap: Why closing it is about more than school


2. Poverty

The report highlights emerging evidence which suggests that “childcare and school building closures during the Covid-19 pandemic have affected children from low-income families and children in vulnerable situations more severely than others”.

It adds: “Key areas of concern for low-income families included increasing levels of poverty, food insecurity, utility payments and fuel poverty, digital divide issues, and family and child wellbeing.”

3. Home learning

Pupils from poorer backgrounds have been “more likely” to have “a less positive experience of remote learning” while unable to attend school buildings. There have been “considerable differences” in “access to resources to support home learning - such as electronic devices, internet access, a quiet space to study and parental guidance”. And there have been “additional barriers to home learning where English is an additional language or where children have additional needs”.

4. Employment and training

The report states: “As a result of Covid-19 restrictions, young people who are students have had their skills, learning and development disrupted, which poses challenges for attainment, career progression and longer-term participation in education, employment or training.

“Many sectors that are active employers of apprentices were necessarily placed into lockdown and are now experiencing the consequences of these measures. Recruitment decisions were paused or stopped altogether while restrictions on workplaces and the Job Retention Scheme remained in place.”

As one example, as of November 2020, the number of modern apprenticeship (MA) starts was 3,633 - a decrease of 10,086 from November 2019, when the number of MA starts was 13,719. Previously, numbers had been increasing since 2014.

5. Mental health

The report finds “emerging evidence that interventions, such as social distancing, stay-at-home guidance and school closures, have likely had an adverse effect on the mental health and wellbeing of children and young people - although some have reported benefits for their mental health”.

It adds: “Vulnerable children and young people, and those with challenging home environments, are more likely than others to have had experiences during the pandemic that are associated with a risk to mental health and wellbeing, such as disruptions to support. Girls, particularly older girls, and young people from disadvantaged backgrounds have worse mental wellbeing outcomes.”

6. Domestic abuse

The report states: “Services received reports of children being exposed to increased levels of domestic abuse consistent with the period of lockdown. This was due to prolonged contact with perpetrators when children were not returned to the non-abusive parent after contact; perpetrators’ drug and alcohol abuse in the presence of children; and the impact of the perpetrator’s psychological abuse and monitoring behaviours on the non-abusive parent and their parenting capacity.”

It adds that “many services reported that, because children did not have access to safe spaces or other trusted adults, there were fewer opportunities for them to report and receive support”.

The report also notes that, after children returned to school, specialist services “experienced significant challenges in negotiating access to school buildings due to the coronavirus restrictions”.

You need a Tes subscription to read this article

Subscribe now to read this article and get other subscriber-only content:

  • Unlimited access to all Tes magazine content
  • Exclusive subscriber-only stories
  • Award-winning email newsletters

Already a subscriber? Log in

You need a subscription to read this article

Subscribe now to read this article and get other subscriber-only content, including:

  • Unlimited access to all Tes magazine content
  • Exclusive subscriber-only stories
  • Award-winning email newsletters
Recent
Most read
Most shared