Critics decry ‘scandalous’ spike in playing-field sales

Playground sell-offs peak in August, and heads say that council funding cuts could be to blame
21st October 2016, 12:00am
Magazine Article Image

Share

Critics decry ‘scandalous’ spike in playing-field sales

https://www.tes.com/magazine/archived/critics-decry-scandalous-spike-playing-field-sales

More school playing-field sell-offs were approved by the government in August than in any other month this decade - and the numbers are steadily climbing, latest figures reveal.

The government gave the go-ahead for 11 sales in August - the most recent month for which figures are available. This is equal to the yearly total for 2010 and 2011, a TES analysis of Department for Education data shows.

There have already been 17 approvals in 2016, and the annual total could exceed 25 if the rest of the year reflects the numbers seen so far.

Heads have warned that funding pressures within local councils could be fuelling the surge in sell-offs. But the Department for Education insists the sales are not linked to the push to build thousands of new homes and children would not miss out as a result.

Since figures were first recorded in 2010, the government has approved 138 sales.

Campaigners calling for more play space to be set aside for children and young people called the figures “scandalous”.

Tim Gill, former director of the Children’s Play Council and a leading commentator on childhood, said: “It’s completely scandalous that at a time when you have rising childhood obesity, we’re disposing of the very assets that are one of the best ways of helping with children’s physical and emotional health.

“There’s really clear, robust evidence that if you want to boost children’s physical activity levels, you can’t do any better than looking at school playing fields.”

Mr Gill added that access to outdoor space plays an important role in children’s mental health. “The benefits of being outdoors, under the sky and somewhere green are well researched,” he said.

DfE guidance states that the first priority for reinvesting the proceeds from playing-field sales should be sports facilities.

Using the cash for “recreation or education facilities” is also acceptable, though sports should take precedence, the guidance says.

In 2012, former education secretary Michael Gove relaxed government regulations setting out the minimum outdoor space schools had to provide pupils for team games.

Pupils ‘banned from running’

The merging or rebuilding of schools is one of the most commonly stated reasons for land being sold. But in some cases, new school sites contain less playing-field space than those they have replaced, according to Malcolm Trobe, interim general secretary of the Association of School and College Leaders.

He said: “There’s a need to ensure that there’s sufficient play space, not just for sports, but also just for general running around, particularly for younger children.”

A TES investigation in 2014 found that 35 per cent of schools that had recently expanded or were due to expand would end up with less outdoor space for children.

Speaking about the latest figures, Mr Trobe warned that funding pressures could be behind the increase in sell-offs. He said: “Local authorities are under significant pressure in their funds and are having to sell off land in order to carry out building programmes.”

The DfE first released detailed information on playing field sell-offs a year ago. Since then, none have been refused permission by the government; only eight have been refused in total since 2010.

The figures also show that there have been seven occasions where the advisory body had refused to grant approval and were overruled by the DfE.

Juno Hollyhock, executive director of Learning Through Landscapes, a charity aimed at improving children’s outdoor learning and play, said she believed that “increasing numbers of schools” were taking measures such as banning children from running in playgrounds, due to space shortages, adding it was “very unlikely” that amalgamated schools would provide the same square footage of space as their predecessor sites combined.

The charity was beginning to see examples of schools moving to new sites with improved buildings but “unusable” playgrounds, because insufficient resources had been set aside for outdoor space.

She said: “We’re seeing a reduced amount of school playing fields, particularly for leisure time and play.

“The schools have to be able to provide specific space for the PE curriculum, but that doesn’t always include space to run.”

A Local Government Association spokesman said: “Councils do not support the selling off of school playing fields except when a school is closed or merged or in exceptional circumstances, and then applications have to meet strict agreed criteria to be approved by the secretary of state for education.”

It is important that decisions are taken based on local need rather than short term gain, the spokesman added.

A DfE spokeswoman said: “These school playing-field figures represent a tiny proportion of the total playing-field land across the country and consent has only been granted where schools have demonstrated there is no impact on their sports curriculum.

“We are investing £160 million a year to PE and school sport, and this will be doubled next year to £320 million through the primary PE and sport premium.”

@CharlotteSantry

You need a Tes subscription to read this article

Subscribe now to read this article and get other subscriber-only content:

  • Unlimited access to all Tes magazine content
  • Exclusive subscriber-only stories
  • Award-winning email newsletters

Already a subscriber? Log in

You need a subscription to read this article

Subscribe now to read this article and get other subscriber-only content, including:

  • Unlimited access to all Tes magazine content
  • Exclusive subscriber-only stories
  • Award-winning email newsletters
Recent
Most read
Most shared