Skip to main content

If education is a priority, where’s the cash?

The UK sets spending targets for aid and defence – so why not add education to the mix to show that the government will ‘defend the next generation’

Magazine article image

When I worked in the Treasury, there were two unwritten rules about public spending. One was that ring-fenced budgeting was a bad idea, because it restricted government (read: Treasury) flexibility. The other was that targets based on a set amount of money being spent were also a bad idea, because they contributed to the notion that inputs were what mattered, not outputs, and hampered efforts to drive efficiency.

So, here’s an idea. The UK has two areas where it sets a firm spending commitment: 0.7 per cent of GDP on aid (to meet the UN target) and 2 per cent of GDP on defence (to meet the ...

Subscribe to get access to the content on this page.

If you are already a Tes/ Tes Scotland subscriber please log in with your username or email address to get full access to our back issues, CPD library and membership plus page.

Not a subscriber? Find out more about our subscription offers.

Subscribe now