Skip to main content

The system should fit the individual – not vice versa

An end to neoliberalism’s deceit and moral cowardice is what will transform working-class prospects, not a cheap focus on social mobility, argues Diane Reay

Magazine article image

If social mobility is the answer, we are asking the wrong questions. Social mobility has always been about moving up a small number of working-class high achievers. It is “merely converting into doctors, barristers and professors a certain number of people who would otherwise have been manual workers”, as RH Tawney argued in the early 20th century.

He also made the case that social wellbeing depended upon cohesion and solidarity. “It implies the existence not merely of opportunities to ascend, but of a high level of general culture, a strong sense of common interests and a diffusion throughout ...

Subscribe to get access to the content on this page.

If you are already a Tes/ Tes Scotland subscriber please log in with your username or email address to get full access to our back issues, CPD library and membership plus page.

Not a subscriber? Find out more about our subscription offers.

Subscribe now