Teaching under Prevent: ‘The duty does not protect our students and “others” Muslim teachers’

For this special issue, TES asked a broad selection of teachers to describe their experience of working under the duty. In this article, an RE teacher shares his story
4th November 2016, 12:00am
Magazine Article Image

Share

Teaching under Prevent: ‘The duty does not protect our students and “others” Muslim teachers’

https://www.tes.com/magazine/archived/teaching-under-prevent-duty-does-not-protect-our-students-and-others-muslim

As a Muslim teacher of Pakistani heritage born and raised in the UK, I knew that I would have to show and prove my ability as a teacher more than my non-Muslim colleagues, as well as my white British colleagues.

In my school, I was not the only Muslim Pakistani teacher - indeed, the majority of the student population came from the Muslim Pakistani community. Despite this, Muslim and/or Pakistani teachers were rarely, if at all, championed as potential role models, or valued as pioneers for the student community.

Also, having been employed as an RE teacher, I was frequently quizzed by other teachers in the department about my opinions on other religions. I responded by discussing curriculum content to demonstrate a breadth and depth of knowledge on my teaching subject.

I couldn’t help but feel, however, that these questions were intended to be more probing than just a superfluous query about my subject knowledge.

And now, the introduction of Prevent has made the situation worse. It has given more credence to such queries and legitimised interrogations into Muslim teachers’ suitability for the profession.

Viewed with suspicion

For almost all Muslim teachers, students and parents, this perceived threat of radicalisation has become a reason for Islam to often be demonised and the expression of “Islamic” belief and practice to be specifically viewed with suspicion.

As a Muslim teacher, Prevent is very tricky indeed. I actually understand Islam, both as a faith and life practice, and as a civilisation with a long history, with its own political, economic, social and cultural systems and forms.

But I daren’t acknowledge a knowledge of this publicly, let alone confidently teach my predominantly Muslim students about the history of Islamic civilisation and its contribution to the world of human endeavours in science, philosophy, medicine, and so on, from which modern society generally - and western civilisation particularly - have benefited immensely. Why is this? Because I fear Prevent - and so do my students.

Islam is targeted

I share the frustrations of my students who see Islam being targeted when Muslims are still trying to negotiate and traverse structures and systems of class, education and business, and to find their place of expression from the fabric of this country - a fabric and a country that my parents’ generation worked in the mills of Yorkshire to weave, and in the foundries of the steel industry, along with the factories of the machine industries, to build.

I think about my grandfather, who served with the British Air Force in Burma during the Second World War. I think about the 1.3 million soldiers from the Indian subcontinent who volunteered to serve the British war effort in the First World War and the 2.5 million soldiers from colonised India who did the same in the Second World War.

Explaining this shared history to my students may inspire them to ask more pointed, critical and purposeful questions to explore and develop a true sense of value for their own history, life narratives and future trajectory and place of belonging in British society. It would prompt an exploration of identity and history that would question the dominant narrative.

But alas, Prevent prevents us doing this by establishing fear in the hearts of Muslim parents and teachers that students may ask questions that Prevent wishes - in fact, requires - us to report.

We need to safeguard against extremism with respect, openness and dialogue

We need to safeguard against extremism, but we need to do this with respect, openness and with the skills of dialogue and debate inherent to a good education - skills that we know to be necessary to success in systems of law and politics.

If I were in charge, I would safeguard against extremism by interrogating and debating those extremist views, as well as those same systems of law and politics, rather than shutting down any form of dialogue on them.

If I were in charge, I would safeguard against extremism by pioneering change in the education system with the clear intent of nurturing active citizens for change.

If I were in charge, I would safeguard against extremism by enabling teachers, students and their parents to develop their own sense of self and belonging in society and history and to effect active involvement and change, not prevent it.


Imran Arif is a secondary school teacher in the North of England

You need a Tes subscription to read this article

Subscribe now to read this article and get other subscriber-only content:

  • Unlimited access to all Tes magazine content
  • Exclusive subscriber-only stories
  • Award-winning email newsletters

Already a subscriber? Log in

You need a subscription to read this article

Subscribe now to read this article and get other subscriber-only content, including:

  • Unlimited access to all Tes magazine content
  • Exclusive subscriber-only stories
  • Award-winning email newsletters
Recent
Most read
Most shared