Ancient history

I am saddened by the OCR exam board's decision to axe the A-level in ancient history (TES, March 30) and subsume it under classical civilisation. It is hard to see this as anything more than cost-cutting.

At our sixth-form college in north Hampshire, we began preparing students for the ancient history A-level in 2003. From an initial cohort of 30 at AS-level in the first year, we have grown to an entry of about 130 at AS and 90 at A2. It is the most popular choice for students in a department that also offers both modern and early modern history.

We are not untypical as a history department, operating for the 16-19 age group in the state sector. There is a huge demand to study this kind of history. For many students outside the private sector, this is the first chance to pursue their enthusiasm since Year 4 or 5.

Many have enjoyed 20th-century topics at GCSE and relish the chance to do something different at A-level. We market this as a discrete history syllabus: if it is to be subsumed under a more general title, its appeal will be severely undermined.

If OCR did more market research and promotion, it might realise that it has a winner here and would not reach so readily for the accountant's axe.

Thomas Pearson Head of history and politics, Queen Mary's College, Basingstoke, Hants

Log in or register for FREE to continue reading.

It only takes a moment and you'll get access to more news, plus courses, jobs and teaching resources tailored to you