Dead languages beat live subjects in EBac madness

28th January 2011, 12:00am

Share

Dead languages beat live subjects in EBac madness

https://www.tes.com/magazine/archive/dead-languages-beat-live-subjects-ebac-madness-0

Leo Winkley and Farooq Ahmed both argue for the inclusion of RE in the EBac (Letters, January 21). Here’s why they are wrong.

The humanities have evolved from the classical tradition in European education, which aimed to study the highest achievements of humanity, particularly in literature and history. Renaissance humanism and later the Enlightenment emphasised how much human reason and creativity could achieve without divine support.

If pupils are to gain an objective understanding of the origins, effects and spread of religions, that is best done through history and geography. In addition, these two subjects, unlike RE, have rigorous disciplines which empower young people to make sense of human activities and their impact on the natural world.

The EBac is a commendable initiative to define the essence of a broad and balanced education. That essence should not be diluted. Moreover, RE is already a statutory requirement for all pupils.

Martin Roberts, Former headteacher of the Cherwell School, Oxford, and fellow of the Historical Association.

Want to keep reading for free?

Register with Tes and you can read two free articles every month plus you'll have access to our range of award-winning newsletters.

Keep reading for just £1 per month

You've reached your limit of free articles this month. Subscribe for £1 per month for three months and get:

  • Unlimited access to all Tes magazine content
  • Exclusive subscriber-only stories
  • Award-winning email newsletters
Recent
Most read
Most shared