Diploma double-thinking flags up complexity of vocational debate

18th September 2009, 1:00am

Share

Diploma double-thinking flags up complexity of vocational debate

https://www.tes.com/magazine/archive/diploma-double-thinking-flags-complexity-vocational-debate

Your analysis of Diplomas, which contained the example of the pupils who achieved A* in GCSE but repeatedly failed the corresponding functional skills test, speaks volumes about the confused thinking in education.

The fact that these intelligent students, taking a “gold standard” qualification, could not apply that knowledge in a meaningful way must cause us to question the sanctity of our GCSE and A-levels.

As the real gold standard was out of tune with modern demands at the time, the clamour to tinker with the system and return to O-levels and “harder” A-levels hints at a similar need to hold onto a past that does not give our employers and universities what they need. As a nation, we need new qualifications; more effective and varied ways of assessment.

Using the flaws of the Diploma to question whether we can create genuine competitors to GCSE and A-level is a symptom of the confusion felt by all. We need a genuine baccalaureate combining the best we have, whether it be vocational, “academic”, applied, functional, work-based, school-based or college-based. Is going for the simple option too much to ask of our politicians?

  • Dr Steven Geraghty, Serlby Park, Nottinghamshire.

    Want to keep reading for free?

    Register with Tes and you can read two free articles every month plus you'll have access to our range of award-winning newsletters.

    Keep reading for just £1 per month

    You've reached your limit of free articles this month. Subscribe for £1 per month for three months and get:

    • Unlimited access to all Tes magazine content
    • Exclusive subscriber-only stories
    • Award-winning email newsletters
    Nothing found
    Recent
    Most read
    Most shared