Editing flaw

20th February 1998, 12:00am

Share

Editing flaw

https://www.tes.com/magazine/archive/editing-flaw
Your editing of the letter from four members of the working group on the secondary science initial teacher training national curriculum (TES, February 6) gives the incorrect impression that we think that an A-level pass in physics, chemistry or biology is adequate preparation for a postgraduate certificate in education course which aims to train teachers to teach the subject at key stage 4. Indeed, our letter argued the opposite of this.

I find it hard to see how anyone could claim that standards of science teaching will be improved by attempting to train KS4 teachers to teach a subject in nine months on the basis of an A-level pass awarded several years previously at grade D or E.

JOHN LEACH School of education The University of Leeds

Want to keep reading for free?

Register with Tes and you can read two free articles every month plus you'll have access to our range of award-winning newsletters.

Keep reading for just £1 per month

You've reached your limit of free articles this month. Subscribe for £1 per month for three months and get:

  • Unlimited access to all Tes magazine content
  • Exclusive subscriber-only stories
  • Award-winning email newsletters
Recent
Most read
Most shared