Editor’s letter

26th May 2000, 1:00am

Share

Editor’s letter

https://www.tes.com/magazine/archive/editors-letter-6
Government policies over the years have assumed that all schools are secondaries. The national curriculum used a subject model. Ofsted inspection was also based on big schools and had later to be modified for primaries. But not enough, it seems.

It is no coincidence, as Gerald Haigh points out (page 6), that all four teachers whose deaths have been linked to Ofsted inspection were from primary schools. For primary teachers, the way they teach is intrinsic to who they are.

Maybe it is time to accept that primary teachers are different from secondary teachers. They are more isolated and less Bolshie. f Ofsted says Year 3 is badly taught, the finger points to a person, not a big department. If nowadays they teach children and subjects, it’s the children who still come first. It is tempting simply to tell primary teachers not to get so wound up about inspection, but let’s look at it another way: their exceptional dedication should be seen as an asset, and not as a problem. Maybe it’s the system that needs to change. Of course teachers should be accountable, but they should also be trusted. The lack of trust has led to a system that feels so threatening.

Diane Hofkins

Editor TES Primary


Want to keep reading for free?

Register with Tes and you can read two free articles every month plus you'll have access to our range of award-winning newsletters.

Keep reading for just £1 per month

You've reached your limit of free articles this month. Subscribe for £1 per month for three months and get:

  • Unlimited access to all Tes magazine content
  • Exclusive subscriber-only stories
  • Award-winning email newsletters
Recent
Most read
Most shared