English tests fall wide of the marking

Julie Henry

The marking of this year's English tests for 14-year-olds is being questioned by schools, following discoveries of widespread inconsistencies.

With the first national targets for this age group and the introduction of the Government's new key stage 3 strategy from September, the importance of the tests has been increased for secondary schools.

A number of teachers have queried results from this summer's tests and returned all scripts for remarking, amid fears that inaccurate scores will take on increasing significance.

At Eggbuckland community college, Plymouth, the proportion of 14-year-olds achieving the expected level 5 fell by 18 percentage points to 54 per cent this summer. In 2000, the proportion making the grade shot up by a fifth, yet the two cohorts were of very similar ability.

Head of English Sarah Young said: "Such violent swings of the pendulum from one year to the next is worrying and undermines our ability to use national tests for benchmarking."

She said some pupils were awarded levels lower than in tests at age 11. Others will have over-inflated predictions for their GCSEperformance.

The head of English at one London school queried why his English marks this year were significantly lower than the maths and science scores. He said:

"These tests are often so way out that we have told our Year 9s that they should just ignore the national test results and go by teacher assessment."

Last summer, many schools received their English results later than expected because of extra checks by the Qualifications and Curriculum Authority. Despite the tightening up of procedures, there was a surge in the number of appeals and nearly 18,000 papers were upgraded.

Trevor Millum, development director for the National Association for the Teaching of English, said it was clear that national test marking was not up to scratch. He said teacher assessment should play a bigger part in establishing student levels.

David Hargreaves, QCA chief executive, has proposed that teacher assessment be used to reduce the burden of an "elaborate, extensive and expensive" testing system.

AQCA spokesman said: It is wellknown that absolutely consistent marking of language work is difficult because of the wide range of ways children can express themselves. We do aim at as careful a standardisation as possible."

Register to continue reading for free

It only takes a moment and you'll get access to more news, plus courses, jobs and teaching resources tailored to you

Julie Henry

Latest stories

New headteachers - here are 9 things you need to know

Headteacher wellbeing and sources of 'streth'

Former headteacher Chris McDermott set out to find out the true causes of leader stress and support – and in doing so coined a whole new term, as he explains here
Chris McDermott 2 Dec 2021
Transdisciplinary learning: how to embed it in your school

Why you need a transdisciplinary curriculum

At the Aspirations Academies, six hours a week are dedicated to applied transdisciplinary learning - but how does it work? And should you apply something similar at your school?
Steve Kenning 2 Dec 2021
Expert governors can now come and help schools and trusts

Why schools and trusts can now hire 'expert governors'

Providing access to expert governors for struggling settings - or those willing to pay £500 a day for their insights - could have a huge benefit across education, claims the National Governance Association
Emily Attwood 2 Dec 2021