Exclusive: Smaller leadership teams needed in funding squeeze, commissioner tells heads

Sir David Carter, the national schools commissioner, says that there is a link between a school’s financial sustainability and educational standards
30th March 2017, 11:38am

Share

Exclusive: Smaller leadership teams needed in funding squeeze, commissioner tells heads

https://www.tes.com/magazine/archive/exclusive-smaller-leadership-teams-needed-funding-squeeze-commissioner-tells-heads
Thumbnail

Secondary schools need smaller leadership teams as they seek to cope with the financial squeeze, the national schools commissioner has warned.

Schools have to make savings of £3 billion by 2019-20, according to the National Audit Office, while thousands are set to see their funding fall under the proposed national funding formula.

Sir David Carter told headteachers in Yorkshire this month that the system had “gone beyond the point” where schools could cope by “just making cuts to every budget line we have”.

Calling for schools to “fundamentally reconceptualise” how they use resources, he told the conference in Leeds, organised by the Pathfinder Teaching School Alliance: “Our management systems and structures in secondary look like they did in 2005, but our funding model has not kept pace with that.”

He gave the example of a 1,600-pupil secondary school he visited which had 45 people in its “extended leadership team”.

Sir David said that, at a meeting to discuss the school’s deficit, “no one in the room other than me was making a connection between the two things”.

Big senior teams ‘a thing of the past’

He added: “The idea that you can continue to have big senior teams and big middle leadership teams in secondary is one of the things we need to think about.

“What I am seeing around the country is an emergence of a very small leadership team in secondary: a principal, vice-principal, maybe an assistant, who are the cabinet, set the vision, set the pace, set the strategy, within a much flatter structure below of young people, often middle leaders, who are developing their subject expertise, to deliver that vision.”

The other alternative he outlined was a “flat leadership team”, whose members “have responsibility for a whole-school initiative, a curriculum area, a welfare area”.

He also told delegates that he had seen a link between financial sustainability and educational standards.

He said that while they were often seen as two separate tracks, “what I have seen in this job in the last 12 months is a really close correlation between trusts and schools that are in financial difficulty, and two or three years later, sometimes quicker, educational standards declining because the resource that was there in the past is not there any more”.

Want to keep up with the latest education news and opinion? Follow Tes on Twitter and like Tes on Facebook

 

Want to keep reading for free?

Register with Tes and you can read two free articles every month plus you'll have access to our range of award-winning newsletters.

Keep reading for just £1 per month

You've reached your limit of free articles this month. Subscribe for £1 per month for three months and get:

  • Unlimited access to all Tes magazine content
  • Exclusive subscriber-only stories
  • Award-winning email newsletters
Recent
Most read
Most shared