Failings of a funding formula

21st April 2000, 1:00am

Share

Failings of a funding formula

https://www.tes.com/magazine/archive/failings-funding-formula
THE CRY from David Hart, general secretary of the National Association of Head Teachers, for a national funding formula fails to explain how that would give extra money to schools.

It could mean less as local government contributes 25 per cent of the funding and in addition spends pound;600 million more than the Government thinks it should on schools.

Any formula has to be transparent (which it is not at present), fair and be based on different needs of each school. The Local Government Association is discussing ways this could be done including a basic entitlement for a staffing formula for each school.

However, funding all schools at the same rate is a recipefor discriminating against poor areas resulting in making it more difficult to raise standards in such schools.

Funding schools is complex. A national funding system would mean more unfairness and damage democratic accountability. Let’s have a sensible discussion on the way to move forward, but no system will be acceptable that fails to bring about smaller classes and more money going into schools, otherwise standards will not rise sufficiently. Having that money spent wisely is the next step.

Graham Lane

Labour group chair

Education and lifelong learning

executive

Local Government Association

110 Humberstone Road, London E13


Want to keep reading for free?

Register with Tes and you can read two free articles every month plus you'll have access to our range of award-winning newsletters.

Keep reading for just £1 per month

You've reached your limit of free articles this month. Subscribe for £1 per month for three months and get:

  • Unlimited access to all Tes magazine content
  • Exclusive subscriber-only stories
  • Award-winning email newsletters
Recent
Most read
Most shared