Flawed measure of performance

Tes Editorial

I am writing to draw your readers' attention to the flaws in the concept of context value added (CVA) as applied by Ofsted in its evaluation of schools.

I appreciate the need to move from crude measures of attainment value-added measures. But CVA is based not simply on a pupil's progress, but also ethnic make-up, deprivation and gender balance. Yet these factors are mostly the same for pupils on intake as at the end of their time in school.

And CVA misses a crucial factor in a school's context, namely funding per pupil of which there is a huge variation.

The statistical basis on which CVA is predicated is also flawed. I assume that there is hard evidence to justify including ethnicity and gender as significant factors in a school's context.

I do not understand how the same can be true for deprivation: given that a pupil may be entitled to free school meals in Year 7 but no longer by Year 11, or vice versa, CVA also implies that we as a nation have lower expectations of ethnic minority and poor children and boys.

Philip Grady

Headteacher Bury Church of England high school, Haslam Brow Bury, Lancashire

Register to continue reading for free

It only takes a moment and you'll get access to more news, plus courses, jobs and teaching resources tailored to you

Tes Editorial

Latest stories