Four ways in which it's different, y'know, spoken grammar

The grammar of spoken English varies from that of written English. TES looks at some of its key features

Adi Bloom

News article image

The grammar of spoken English is so different from that of written English that Ronald Carter, emeritus professor of modern English language at the University of Nottingham, believes that it should be taught to teachers and, potentially, to pupils as well.

“The focus has tended to be on formal, written grammar,” he says. “But spoken language counts for 95 per cent of the language we produce every day. So the more teachers can understand the different grammars of how we speak and write, the more effective the teaching of writing can be.”

Here are some of the key points of the grammar of spoken English:

  1. Ellipsis
    “There’s a lot more ellipsis in spoken grammar...,” Carter says, proving his own point by leaving out the words “than in written grammar”. For example, if a friend were to tell you that he was going to Barcelona, you might respond: “Oh, yeah. Nice place.” In written language, you would need to say: “Barcelona is a nice place”; in spoken language, the subject of the sentence is implicit.
  2. Inverted heads and tails
    The heads and tails of sentences are often inverted in spoken language: “That house on the corner – is that where she lives?” rather than “Does she live in that house on the corner?” This helps the listener to identify what you are referring to, before you ask a question about it.
  3. Wagging tails
    “It’s difficult to eat, isn’t it, spaghetti?” The intelligibility of this sentence relies on the fact that the speaker is sitting in an Italian restaurant, with tomato sauce dripping down her blouse.
  4. Vagueness
    Spoken language is vaguer than written language: it is full of "that kind of thing", "that sort of thing" and "stuff". “We all do it thousands of times a day,” says Carter, “often because we don’t want to go into too much detail and bore people. But in a formal exam you’d get marked down for being imprecise if you used words like ‘thing’ and ‘stuff’."

This is an edited version of a feature in the 5 August issue of TES, a grammar special issue. Subscribers can read the full story hereTo subscribe, click here. To download the digital edition, Android users can click here and iOS users can click here. For more on spoken grammar and top grammar teaching tips for both primary and secondary teachers, the magazine is available in all good newsagents.

Want to keep up with the latest education news and opinion? Follow TES on Twitter and like TES on Facebook


Register to continue reading for free

It only takes a moment and you'll get access to more news, plus courses, jobs and teaching resources tailored to you

Adi Bloom

Adi Bloom is Tes comment editor

Latest stories

FE White Paper: We can't welcome it – here's why

Why we shouldn't welcome the FE White Paper

The new Skills for Jobs White Paper put colleges at the centre of an underfunded, narrow, skills-based and business-led plan, writes Sean Vernell
Sean Vernell 25 Jan 2021
Covid in schools, GCSEs 2021, teacher safety: LIVE

Coronavirus and schools: LIVE 25/1

A one-stop shop for teachers who want to know what impact the ongoing pandemic will have on their working lives
Tes Reporter 25 Jan 2021