Glow must be more reliable

16th April 2010, 1:00am

Share

Glow must be more reliable

https://www.tes.com/magazine/archive/glow-must-be-more-reliable

It has been nearly three months since I wrote my TESS article calling for a moratorium on the future development of Glow, until it becomes usable regularly. I’ve watched with fascination as a polarised and fractured debate has developed around many of the challenges surrounding this project.

Andrew Brown and Marie Dougan from Learning and Teaching Scotland (LTS) have come forward to defend Glow in The TESS, and others have been equally positive on various blogs. But the most numerous replies have been from classroom teachers agreeing with my stance and going much further with their critiques.

The optimistic rhetoric around Glow is not a problem exclusive to Scotland; it is common with any medium or large education IT project. There is much less talk on the proper and rigorous evaluation needed to justify spending huge sums of public money. It is not good enough for us to accept platitudes such as “it makes learning more fun” or “children are more engaged” without proper assessment of the impact of such projects on achievement.

And just because there is international interest in Scotland’s so-called national (this is anything but true at present) intranet, does not mean it is good.

I still use Glow, but selectively, and it is not an embedded part of my classroom practice. It won’t be until it delivers more and better. It is currently a resource bank for my students, but we are planning to move stuff away from Glow and on to the school website - just because it is more reliable and easier for pupils to access.

Glow has excellent features and, with a little creative subversion, parts such as Glow Meet and pupil-driven Glow groups can be used very effectively in the classroom to contextualise and situate learning firmly and collaboratively in the realm of reality.

These links with the real world are vital for effective deep learning and knowledge retention. But this depends on reliability, ease of access and infrastructure availability - something outside LTS’s control.

www.mimanifesto.wordpress.com

Jaye Richards, Cathkin High, Cambuslang.

Want to keep reading for free?

Register with Tes and you can read two free articles every month plus you'll have access to our range of award-winning newsletters.

Keep reading for just £1 per month

You've reached your limit of free articles this month. Subscribe for £1 per month for three months and get:

  • Unlimited access to all Tes magazine content
  • Exclusive subscriber-only stories
  • Award-winning email newsletters
Recent
Most read
Most shared