Grammars aren’t upwardly mobile

10th July 2009, 1:00am

Share

Grammars aren’t upwardly mobile

https://www.tes.com/magazine/archive/grammars-arent-upwardly-mobile

At last, a serious debunking of the grammar school myth in Gerard Kelly’s excellent editorial last week. Those with nostalgic memories of their grammar school days forget that they were a small minority of hand picked pupils. The vast majority went to largely under funded and understaffed secondary moderns where most pupils left at 15 without sitting any exams.

Gerard Kelly provided ample statistical evidence to discredit the fallacy that grammar schools were a major route to propel bright working-class children up the social ladder. A fallacy also recognised by “two brains” David Willetts MP when, as Conservative education spokesman, he said that the idea that selection transforms the life chances of bright poor kids “is a widespread belief but we just have to recognise that there is overwhelming evidence that such academic selection entrenches advantage; it does not spread it”.

Paul Holmes MP, Vice-chair of Comprehensive Future, Lib Dem member of Commons select committee on schools.

Want to keep reading for free?

Register with Tes and you can read two free articles every month plus you'll have access to our range of award-winning newsletters.

Keep reading for just £1 per month

You've reached your limit of free articles this month. Subscribe for £1 per month for three months and get:

  • Unlimited access to all Tes magazine content
  • Exclusive subscriber-only stories
  • Award-winning email newsletters
Nothing found
Recent
Most read
Most shared